A recommender brief is a factual memory aid, not a draft letter in disguise. Its purpose is to make logistics and shared experiences easy to find while leaving the recommendation’s judgment and wording with the recommender. Always check the program’s rules before sending any supporting material.
Think about who has directly observed your work, response to feedback and interaction with other people. A senior title alone does not supply detailed evidence. List possible recommenders beside the situations they actually saw rather than ranking them by organizational status.
Some programs specify the relationship they require. Stanford GSB, for example, generally asks for a current direct supervisor or next-best alternative and another person who has supervised the applicant. Check the exact rule and any explanation field before substituting someone.
Explain the programs and deadlines, ask whether the person can provide a recommendation, and give them room to decline. A clear yes from someone with time and relevant observations is more useful than an assumed commitment.
Keep a private logistics tracker with program, deadline, invitation status and submission status. Use the application’s permitted reminder process. Do not share a recommender’s private contact information in a public planning document.
Keep the brief factual
A compact brief can identify projects you worked on together, dates, your responsibilities and relevant outcomes you can verify. Include your current resume and a concise description of your goals if the program permits those materials. Mark uncertainty rather than turning a rough recollection into a confident claim.
Avoid writing praise in the recommender’s voice. “You supervised my scheduling project from March through June” is context. “I was the strongest analyst you have ever managed” is a proposed evaluation and should not be presented as a fact for the recommender to repeat.
For a fictional example, a factual reminder might say: “In the March rollout, you asked me to make the handoff checklist usable by the support team; I revised it after their trial.” It should not say: “Please describe this as exceptional leadership.” The first recalls an observable event. The second tries to supply the evaluator’s conclusion.
Factual reminders versus writing the recommendation
Appropriate preparation
Leave to the recommender
Project dates and your actual responsibilities.
Their judgment of your performance.
A factual reminder of feedback they gave.
Which example they choose and how they interpret it.
Program names and verified deadlines.
The letter’s words, comparisons and final submission.
Include feedback you actually received
A useful memory prompt can identify a piece of feedback, what you did in response and what the recommender subsequently observed. This gives the recommender a way to locate real evidence; it does not dictate how they should evaluate it.
For a fictional example, an employee was asked to make updates more concise, changed the format, and then received follow-up comments from the manager. A factual brief would record the event and dates. It would not invent a leadership transformation or a quote.
Respect program-specific authorship boundaries
Stanford’s rules require recommenders to be the sole authors and prohibit applicants from drafting, editing or submitting their own recommendations. The policy is broader than simply avoiding a full ghostwritten letter. Follow the school’s instructions if a recommender asks you to draft or revise anything.
A practical response is to offer factual records and point to the program’s policy, while leaving the writing with the recommender. If a rule is unclear, ask the admissions office rather than treating a generic online template as permission.
Keep recommendation preparation separate from essay preparation
Your career-goals essay is your own writing task. A recommender may observe relevant experiences, but their letter should not become a synchronized copy of your application story. Consistency of facts matters; identical phrasing is not the goal.
The MBA and graduate collection provides application-planning exercises, including recommender preparation. It does not write recommendations or include GRE/GMAT preparation. Review the sample to see whether you need a workbook, or whether a simple factual document already solves the problem.
MBA career and leadership writing alongside academic SOP, personal-history and research-fit guidance. Includes four complete fictional teaching essays, revision examples, recommender and interview preparation, and a final audit.
Official sources checked October 8, 2026. The provider or program’s current instructions take precedence. Original examples are teaching material, not applicant submissions. About our research, AI assistance and corrections.